Austronesian alignment
Information about Austronesian alignment
Austronesian alignment, commonly known as the Philippine- or Austronesian-type voice system, is a typologically unusual morphosyntactic alignment that combines features of ergative and accusative languages. It is best known from the languages of the Philippines, but is also found in Formosa, Borneo, and Madagascar, and has been reconstructed for the ancestral Proto-Austronesian language.
Whereas most languages have two voices which are used to track referents in discourse, an 'active' transitive voice and a 'passive' (referred to as 'antipassive' in the case of ergative languages) intransitive voice (with an optional oblique noun phrase like by all in "his call was heard by all"), in prototypical Philippine languages the two voices are both transitive. One of the two Philippine voices is similar in form to the active voice of ergative languages, while the other is similar to the active voice of accusative languages. These perform functions similar to the active and passive/antipassive voices, respectively, in other languages.
The ergative-like Philippine voice has in the past often been called the "passive"; however, this terminology is misleading and is now disfavored, though no substitute has been widely accepted. Among the more common terms that have been proposed for these voices are patient trigger (the ergative-like voice) and agent trigger (the accusative-like voice), which will be used here. These phrases are taken from the terms 'agent' and 'patient', used in semantics for the acting and acted-upon participants in a transitive clause.
The three voice systems can be contrasted as follows:
| Morphological alignment | Case of basic intransitive clause | Cases of basic transitive clause | Cases of the secondary voice |
|---|---|---|---|
| Accusative (as most European languages) | nominative (same case as Agent) | Active voice | Passive voice |
| nominative (Agent) | nominative (Patient) | ||
| accusative (Patient) | optional oblique (Agent) | ||
| Ergative (as most Australian languages) | absolutive (same case as Patient) | Active voice | Antipassive voice |
| absolutive (Patient) | absolutive (Agent) | ||
| ergative (Agent) | optional oblique (Patient) | ||
| Austronesian (as most Philippine languages) | "direct" (the case common to the two transitive voices) | Patient trigger | Agent trigger |
| "direct" (Patient) | "direct" (Agent) | ||
| ergative (Agent) | accusative (Patient) |
The Philippine cases are only approximately equivalent to their namesakes in other languages ("direct" as used here is commonly called "nominative", but could as easily be called "absolutive", for example), and are therefore placed in scare quotes. The "ergative" case is identical in form to the Philippine genitive case, but it is common in ergative languages for the ergative case to have the form of an oblique case such as a genitive or locative.
Lynch et al. 2002 (p. 59) illustrate the Philippine system with reconstructed Proto-Malayo-Polynesian examples. (The asterisks indicate a reconstruction.) The unmarked clause order was to have the verb first and the "direct" phrase last. The voice (the patient or agent trigger) was indicated by an affix to the verb (suffix -ən and infix <um>, respectively). In modern Philippine languages, the practical effect of this voice distinction is rather like the difference between the use of a and the in English, and it is assumed that it played a similar role in the protolanguage.
| *ka’ən-ən | na | manuk | a | wai |
| eat-(patient trigger) | (ergative) | chicken | (direct) | mango |
- 'The chicken is eating the mango', or 'The mango is being eaten by the chicken'
| *k<um>a’ən | ta | wai | a | manuk |
| <(agent trigger)>eat | (accusative) | mango | (direct) | chicken |
- 'The chicken is eating a mango.'
Some scholars maintain that Philippine-type languages have four voices, rather than two. Beside the ones shown above, there were also locative and benefactive voices. However, these are not as central as the other two. The locative is illustrated here; the suffix on the verb indicates that the noun marked by the direct case is the location of the action rather than a participant:
| *ka’ən-an | na | manuk | a | kahiw |
| eat-(location trigger) | (ergative) | chicken | (direct) | tree |
- 'The chicken is eating in the tree', or 'The tree is being eaten in by the chicken'
In Tagalog
A broadly similar system is found in Tagalog, the best known language of this type.| B<um>asa | nang | aklat | ang | tao.
| sent agent trigger>read || (indirect) || book || (direct) || person
|}
:The person reads a book.
{|
| ''B<'''in'''>asa'' || '''''nang''''' || ''tao'' || '''''ang''''' || ''aklat.''
|-
| |}|}
Linguistic Typology is an international peer-reviewed journal in the field of linguistic typology, founded in 1997. It is published by Mouton de Gruyter on behalf of the Association for Linguistic Typology. Its editor-in-chief is Prof. Frans Plank (University of Konstanz). ..... Click the link for more information. Morphological typology is a way of classifying the languages of the world (see linguistic typology) that groups languages according to their common morphological structures. ..... Click the link for more information. This article or section may be confusing or unclear for some readers. Please [improve the article] or discuss this issue on the talk page. This article has been tagged since April 2007. ..... Click the link for more information. A synthetic language, in linguistic typology, is a language with a high morpheme-per-word ratio. This linguistic classification is largely independent of morpheme-usage classifications (such as fusional, agglutinative, etc. ..... Click the link for more information. fusional language (also called inflecting language) is a type of synthetic language, distinguished from agglutinative languages by its tendency to "squish together" many morphemes in a way which can be difficult to segment. ..... Click the link for more information. An agglutinative language is a language that uses agglutination extensively: most words are formed by joining morphemes together. This term was introduced by Wilhelm von Humboldt in 1836 to classify languages from a morphological point of view. ..... Click the link for more information. Polysynthetic languages are highly synthetic languages, i.e. languages in which words are composed of many morphemes. DefinitionThe degree of synthesis refers to the morpheme-to-word ratio. Languages with more than one morpheme per word are synthetic...... Click the link for more information. An oligosynthetic language (from the Greek ὀλίγος, meaning "few" or "little") is any language using very few morphemes, perhaps only a few hundred, which combine synthetically to form statements. ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistics, morphosyntactic alignment is the system used to distinguish between the arguments of transitive verbs and those of intransitive verbs. The distinction can be made morphologically (through grammatical case or verbal agreement), syntactically (through word ..... Click the link for more information. A nominative-accusative language (or simply accusative language) is one that marks the direct object of transitive verbs distinguishing them from the subject of both transitive and intransitive verbs. ..... Click the link for more information. An ergative-absolutive language (or simply ergative) is one that treats the agent of transitive verbs distinctly from the subject of intransitive verbs and the object of transitive verbs. Ergative vs...... Click the link for more information. An active-stative language, or active language for short, is one in which the sole argument of an intransitive verb is sometimes marked in the same way as the agent of a transitive verb (that is, like a subject in English), and sometimes in the same way as the direct object ..... Click the link for more information. A tripartite language, also called an ergative-accusative language, is one that treats the subject of an intransitive verb, the subject of a transitive verb, and the object of a transitive verb each in different ways. ..... Click the link for more information. A direct-inverse language is a language where clauses with transitive verbs can be expressed either using a direct or an inverse construction. The direct construction is used when the subject of the transitive clause outranks the object in saliency or animacy but the ..... Click the link for more information. The syntactic pivot is the verb argument around which sentences "revolve", in a given language. This usually means the following:
..... Click the link for more information. theta role or θ-role is the formal device for representing syntactic argument structure (the number and type of noun phrases) required syntactically by a particular verb. For example, the verb put requires three arguments (i.e., it is ditransitive). ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistic typology, word order is the order in which words appear in sentences. In many languages, changes in word order occur due to topicalization or in questions. ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistics, a VO language is a language in which the verb typically comes before the object (thus including SVO, VOS and VSO languages). It was W.P. Lehmann who first proposed to reduce the six possible permutations of word order to just two main ones, VO and OV, in ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistic typology, subject-verb-object (SVO), is a sentence structure where the subject comes first, the verb second, and the object third. Languages may be classified according to the dominant sequence of these elements. ..... Click the link for more information. Verb Subject Object (VSO) is a term in linguistic typology. It represents one type of languages when classifying languages according to the sequence of these constituents in neutral expressions: Ate Sam oranges. ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistic typology, Verb Object Subject or Verb Object Agent - commonly used in its abbreviated form VOS or VOA - represents the language-classification type in which the following sequence of the three constituents, in neutral expressions, is ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistics, an OV language is a language in which the object comes before the verb. They are primarily left-branching, or head-final, i.e. heads are often found at the end of their phrases, with a resulting tendency to have the adjectives before nouns, to place ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistic typology, Subject Object Verb (SOV) is the type of languages in which the subject, object, and verb of a sentence appear or usually appear in that order. If English were SOV, then "Sam oranges ate" would be an ordinary sentence. ..... Click the link for more information. Object Subject Verb (OSV) or Object Agent Verb (OAV) is one of the permutations of expression used in Linguistic typology. OSV or OAV denotes the sequence "Object Subject Verb" in neutral expressions: Oranges Sam ate. ..... Click the link for more information. Object Verb Subject (OVS) or Object Verb Agent (OVA) is one of the permutations of expression used in linguistic typology. OVS denotes the sequence 'Object Verb Subject' in unmarked expressions: Oranges ate Sam, Thorns have roses. ..... Click the link for more information. Time Manner Place (TMP) describes one possible ordering of adpositional phrases in sentences.
Linguistic typology has observed that TMP order is common among Subject Object Verb (SOV) languages. ..... Click the link for more information. Place Manner Time is a term used in linguistic typology to state the general order of adpositional phrases in a language's sentences: "to the store by car yesterday". It would seem that it is common among SVO languages. English, French, and Spanish belong to this category. ..... Click the link for more information. Austronesian languages are a language family widely dispersed throughout the islands of Southeast Asia and the Pacific, with a few members spoken on continental Asia. It is on par with Indo-European, Afro-Asiatic and Uralic as one of the best-established ancient language families. ..... Click the link for more information. In linguistics, morphosyntactic alignment is the system used to distinguish between the arguments of transitive verbs and those of intransitive verbs. The distinction can be made morphologically (through grammatical case or verbal agreement), syntactically (through word ..... Click the link for more information. An ergative-absolutive language (or simply ergative) is one that treats the agent of transitive verbs distinctly from the subject of intransitive verbs and the object of transitive verbs.
Ergative vs...... Click the link for more information. This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia.org - the free encyclopedia created and edited by online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of the wikipedia encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License. Search Dictionary(May not be accurate.)
|