penal substitution

Part of a of articles on
Christianity
Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
Septuagint Decalogue
Birth Resurrection
Sermon on the Mount
Great Commission
Translations English
Inspiration Hermeneutics Christian theology
Trinity (Father, Son, Holy Spirit)
History of Theology Apologetics
Creation Fall of Man Covenant Law
Grace Faith Justification Salvation
Sanctification Theosis Worship
Church Sacraments Eschatology
History and traditions
Early Councils
Creeds Missions
Great Schism Crusades Reformation
Great Awakenings Great Apostasy
Restorationism Nontrinitarianism
Thomism Arminianism
Congregationalism Topics in Christianity
Movements Denominations Other religions
Ecumenism Preaching Prayer
Music Liturgy Calendar
Symbols Art Criticism
Important figures
Apostle Paul Church Fathers
Constantine Athanasius Augustine
Anselm Aquinas Palamas Luther
Calvin Wesley
Arius Marcion of Sinope
Archbishop of Canterbury Catholic Pope
Coptic Pope Ecumenical Patriarch
This box:     [ edit]
Penal substitution is a theory of the atonement within Christian theology, especially associated with the Reformed tradition. It means that Christ is punished (penal) in our place (substitution), thus satisfying the demands of justice, so God can justly forgive. It is thus a specific understanding of substitutionary atonement, where the substitutionary nature of Jesus` death is understood in the sense of a substitutionary punishment. It is also a specific form of satisfaction doctrine which focuses on God's justice being satisfied by Christ's bearing the punishment meant for sinners.

Advocates of penal substitution argue that the concept is both Biblically based and rooted in the historical traditions of the Church. Those who are critical of it argue that at least some versions of the theory present difficulties in terms of modern penal theory, and that it presents God as unjust and even cruel.

It has traditionally been compared with the so-called classic theory, that Christ's death represents the cosmic defeat of the devil to whom a ransom had to be paid, a view popularised by Gustaf Aulén and secondly with the notion that the cross had its effect on human beings, by setting forth a supreme example of godliness or by blazing a trail which we must follow or by involving mankind in his redemptive obedience, the so-called subjective or exemplary theory associated with Peter Abelard and Hastings Rashdall.

Penal substitution derives from the idea that divine forgiveness must satisfy divine justice. Important theological background are the doctrine of the Trinity and (for many but not all expressions of the concept of penal substitution) the doctrine of faith union of believers with Christ which prevents an understanding of penal substitution in terms of party A (God) punishing unrelated party B (Jesus) for the sake of third party C (sinners). The doctrine of the Trinity affirms that God takes the punishment upon himself rather than putting it on someone else. The doctrine of union with Christ affirms that by taking the punishment upon himself Jesus fulfils the demands of justice not for an unrelated third party but for those identified with him. The resurrection of Christ is necessarily linked to this as the vindication of Christ and those who belong to him. If, in the penal substitution understanding of the atonement, the death of Christ deals with sin and injustice, his resurrection is the renewal and restoration of righteousness.

History

The Early Church

The history of the early church, following the ending of persecution, with the conversion of the Emperor Constantine, is marked by creedal controversies centring around the doctrines of the Trinity and Christology. The resulting Nicene Creed contains no detailed articulation of a doctrine of the atonement. 'Redemption did not become a battle ground until the twelfth century' [1]. However, amongst the variety of ideas about the atonement during the early centuries, can be detected the so-called 'realist theory' which directed attention to Christ's sufferings and to their significance. According to the Patristics scholar J.N.D. Kelly, 'This pictured Christ as substituting himself for sinful men, shouldering the penalty which justice required them to pay, and reconciling them to God by his sacrificial death', [2]. Amongst the Latin Fathers, St. Augustine in particular writes that 'by His death, the one most true sacrifice offered on our behalf, He purged abolished and extinguished... whatever guilt we had.' 'By it', writes Kelly, 'God's wrath was appeased and we were reconciled to him'. Nevertheless this is one of several strands of thought: he expounds the mediating work of Christ, his act of ransoming humankind and also the exemplary aspect of Christ's work. As with his predecessors, such as Justin Martyr c.100-165 and Gregory of Nazianzus the imagery of sacrifice, ransom, expiation, and reconciliation all appear in his writings. The dominant strain in the writing of the Greek Fathers, such as S. Athanasius, was the so-called 'physical' theory that Christ, by becoming man, restored the divine image in us; but blended with this is the conviction that His death was necessary to release us from the curse of sin, and that he offered himself in sacrifice for us'.[3].

Anselm, Calvin and the Reformers

It was not until St. Anselm of Canterbury's famous work “Cur Deus Homo” (1098 AD) that attention was focused on the theology of redemption with the aim of providing more exact definitions [4] (though there is disagreement as to how influential penal conceptions were in the first five centuries). Anselm held that to sin is for man ‘‘not to render his due to God’’ (Cur Deus Homo, Book I, XI). Comparing what was due to God and what was due to the feudal Lord, he argued that what was due to God was honour. "'Honour' comprises the whole complex of service and worship which the whole creation, animate and inanimate, in heaven and earth, owes to the Creator. The honour of God is injured by the withdrawal of man's service which he is due to offer." [5] This failure constitutes a debt, weight or doom, for which man must make satisfaction, but which lies beyond his competence; only if a new man can be found who by perfect obedience can satisfy God's honour and by some work of supererogation can provide the means of paying the existing debt of his fellows, can God's original purpose be fulfilled. So Christ not only lives a sinless life, which is again his due, but also is willing to endure death for the sake of love. Thus, Anselm's understanding can best be understood from mediaeval feudalistic conceptions of authority, of sanctions and of reparation. Anselmian satisfaction contrasts with penal substitution in that Anselm sees the satisfaction (i.e. restitution) as an alternative to punishment "The honour taken away must be repaid, or punishment must follow" (bk 1 ch 8), whereas penal substitution views the punishment as the means of satisfaction.

Calvin appropriated these ideas but crucially changed the terminology to that of the criminal law with which he was familiar - he was trained as a lawyer - reinterpreted in the light of Biblical teaching on the law. Man is guilty before God's judgement and the only appropriate punishment is eternal death. The Son of God has become man and has stood in man's place to bear the immeasurable weight of wrath; the curse, and the condemnation of a righteous God. He was 'made a substitute and a surety in the place of transgressors and even submitted as a criminal, to sustain and suffer all the punishment which would have been inflicted on them'. [6]

The work of the Reformers, including Zwingli, Philip Melanchthon, and Martin Luther, was hugely influential. It took away from religion the requirement of works, whether corporal or spiritual, of the need for penances, belief in purgatory, indeed the whole mediaeval penitential system; and it did so by emphasising the finality of Christ's work.

Criticisms

The radical response came from the pen of Faustus Socinus, the anti-Trinitarian Italian scholar, who declared [7] that Calvin's description was 'irrational, incoherant, immoral and impossible' [8]. His objections were as follows:

1)Giving pardon does not square with taking satisfaction;
2)There is nothing that conforms with justice about punishing the innocent and letting the guilty go free;
3)The temporary death of one is not a substitute for the eternal death of many;
4)Perfect substitutionary satisfaction would confer on its beneficiaries an unlimited permission to sin.


Calvin's general framework, coinciding as it did with a rising respect for law, considered as a bulwark against the ferments of war, revolution and civil insurrection, remained normative for Reformed Christians for the next three centuries, but Socinus's response likewise remained potent. Moreover, if Socinus spoke from the point of view of the radical reformers, there were also catholics for whom the once and for all nature of Christ's redeeming work was in danger of weakening the doctrine of sanctification and the spiritual life of the believer and his or her appropriation of the divine mystery through the sacraments of penance and the Eucharist.

Further, with the development of notions of inalienable personal responsibility in law, the idea of 'penal' substitution has become less easy to maintain. In modern law, the punishment of the innocent and the acquittal of the guilty is regarded as the perfect example of injustice [9]. F.W. Dillistone stated that '...no strictly penal theology of the atonement can be expected to carry conviction in the world of the twentieth century'. [10].

Among the problems identified is that fact that the word 'penal' implies an association with law, but the relationship between theological ideas and social institutions such as the law changes [11]. The contemporary argument as to the relationship of human rights to positive law is a modern extension of this.

Secondly, ideas of justice and punishment are not the same in Jewish law , imperial Roman law, sixteenth century European law and modern Common law. Thus, for instance,'satisfaction' and 'merit' are understandable within the context of Roman law, but sit less easily within either Old or New Testament conceptions. Likewise, when the word 'penal' is used it raises as many questions about the different theories of punishment, past and present.

Thirdly, in Calvin's work, and subsequently, there is an interplay between legal and cultic language. Words such as 'curse', 'expiation', 'propitiation', 'wrath', 'sacrifice' appear together with sixteenth century legal language. 'The framework is legal, the process is cultic. Removal of legal sanctions is equated with freedom of access in worship'[12]. Calvin contends that it was necessary for Jesus to suffer through a judicial process and to be condemned as a criminal (even though the process was flawed and Pilate washed his hands of the condemnation, but tying this to the need for sacrifice 'proved to be a dead weight upon the thinking and imagining of Reformed Christendom'. [13].

Next, the two words, 'expiation' and 'propitiation' present problems. It has been argued that the former, which means to purge away, needs to be distinguished from the latter which means to appease a person and that it is propitiation which presents the problem for those who are critical of the idea of penal substitution. Austin Farrer argues that St. Paul's words should be translated in terms of expiation not propitiation. [14].

Finally, a view of human salvation which defines it in terms of once-and-for-all acquittal has to deal with its relationship to subsequent actions [15] and the lives of those not born at the time of the Paschal Mystery [16].

Replies

In response J.I. Packer [17] states that language must be used in a stretched sense. God is not a sixteenth century monarch, he says, and divine government is not the same as earthly government. He states that Christians should regard all truth of God as an "apprehended mystery", and always hold that God is greater than our formularies. He holds, nonetheless, that Penal Substitution can be described a model in a way comparable to how physics uses the term. He defines for theology the term model as "explanatory constructs formed to help us know, understand, and deal with God, the ultimate reality." He states that the "mystery of God is more than any one model, even the best, can express." He states that "all the knowledge we can have of the atonement is of a mystery which we can only think and speak by means of models". To Packer, the biblical models are presented as being inspired by God and given to us as "knowledge of the mystery of the cross". The theologian Stephen Sykes has interpreted Packer's account of Penal Substitution as being presented as a metaphor.

Theologians who teach penal substitution are keen to define the doctrine carefully, rather than, as Packer says, crudely. The primary question is, he says, not the rationality or morality of God but the remission of [my]sins. He suggests that it be seen not as a mechanical explanation (how it works) but rather than kerygmatically (what it means to us).[18]. Denney contends that the atonement should not be seen forensically (though as Packer says, Denney avoided the term 'penal' in any case" [19]). What matters in Packer's view is that "Jesus Christ our Lord, moved by a love that was determined to do everything necessary to save us, endured and exhausted the destructive divine judgement for which we were otherwise inescapably destined, and so won us forgiveness, adoption and glory".[20] Thus, John Stott critiques loveless caricatures of the cross as “a sacrifice to appease an angry God, or...a legal transaction in which an innocent victim was made to pay the penalty for the crimes of others” as being “neither the Christianity of the bible in general nor of Paul in particular” and further that “It is doubtful if anybody has ever believed such a crude construction”[21].

Key Bible texts

The Bible includes, not merely the story of the Paschal mystery in the Gospels, but also the sources of ideas of the atonement. The Fathers often worked upon biblical quotations [22], from both Testaments, describing Christ's saving work, sometimes adding one to another from different places in Scripture [23]. Calvin made special appeal to the Suffering Servant passage in Isaiah 53 and to 1 Peter 3:18-22 with its reference to the 'Harrowing of Hell' - the release of the spirits of those who had died before Christ. From the former he singled out 'But he was wounded for our transgressions, he was bruised for our iniquities; upon him was the chastisement that made us whole, and with his stripes we are healed.' Both are set, by Calvin within the context of Pilate's court of judgement to which, however, they do not properly belong [24]; nevertheless, the image of 'one who has borne the stripes and the chastisement which should, by strict desert have fallen' [25] upon others, within the divine purpose, is, all on sides agreed to be an essential element in the story.

On the basis of Romans 3:23-26 it has been argued that there are, in fact, different models of penal substitution [26] in which ideas of justification work together with redemption and sacrifice (expiation). Thus: 'For all alike have sinned and are deprived of the divine glory and all are justified by God's free grace alone through his act of redemption in the person of Christ Jesus. For God designed him to be the means of expiating sin by his death, effective through faith. God meant by this to demonstrate his justice, because in his forbearance he had overlooked the sins of the past, showing that he is himself just and also justified anyone who puts his faith in Jesus.'

Other texts often quoted at Romans 5:1-11' and 1 Peter 3:18

Recent Controversies

Most recently, controversy has arisen over the strict doctrine of penal substitution in which Socinus's argument about the justice of God has been raised: in modern dress the question is put has been whether it constitutes 'cosmic child abuse'[27]. The debate has largely been conducted in evangelical circles [28], though the dismissal of the doctrine of penal substitution on moral grounds by the Anglican Catholic Dean of St. Albans, Dr. Jeffrey John, in a broadcast talk during Holy Week has drawn fire in his direction.

Notes

1. ^ Kelly, J.N.D., Early Christian Doctrines (Black 1968)
2. ^ Kelly (ibid.) p. 376)
3. ^ Kelly (ibid) p. 377; Gregory of Nyssa, who follows him, developed the 'classic' theory of Christ as a ransom
4. ^ J.N.D. Kelly, Early Christian Doctrines (fifth, revised edition; London: Adam & Charles Black, 1977), p. 375: . cf. F.W. Dillistone The Christian Understanding of the Atonement(Nisbet 1968).
5. ^ Southern, Richard, ''Anselm and his biographer (CUP 1963)
6. ^ Calvin Jean, Institutes 2:16:1
7. ^ De Jesu Christo Servatore (1578)
8. ^ J.I. Packer, "What tid the Cross achieve - The Logic of Penal Substitution” in Celebrating the Saving Work of God (Paternoster , 2002) a reprint of his 1973 Tyndale House lecture Bulletin 25 (1974)Packer's essay is also available online [1]Here
9. ^ Anscome G.E.M., "Modern Moral Theory" in Virtue Ethics (OUP 1997; see also Hart H.L.A., Punishment and the Elimination of Responsibility (Hobhouse Memorial Lecture 1962)
10. ^ The Christian Understanding of the Atonement (Nisbet 1963)p. 214
11. ^ Daube, David Studies in Biblical law (CUP 1947)
12. ^ Dillstone ibid. p. 199)
13. ^ Dillistone (ibid)
14. ^ Said or Sung (Faith Press 1964) p.69: 'God himself, says St. Paul, so far from being wrathful against us, or from needing to be propitiated, loved us enough to set forth Christ as an expiation of our sins through his blood.'
15. ^ Fiddes, Paul, Past Event and Present Salvation: The Story of the Atonement (1989)
16. ^ Wiles, Maurice ''The remaking of Christian Doctrine (SCM 1974 ) p. 65.
17. ^ "What did the cross achieve?" (ibid)
18. ^ Packer (ibid) p. 88.
19. ^ James Denney, Atonement And The Modern Mind, (Hodder And Stoughton, 1903) p.271, as quoted by Packer in note 28 of his essay above
20. ^ Packer (ibid)
21. ^ John Stott, The Cross of Christ, (IVP, 1986) p. 172
22. ^ Justin Martyr Dialogue with Trypho: 'Cursed is everyone who hangeth on a tree' - Deuteronomy 21:23; 'Cursed is everyone who continues not in all things that are written in the book of the law': Deuteonomy 27:26, quoted in Galatians 3:10-13
23. ^ Gregory of Nazianzus quotes in the same passage Galatians (above), 1 Corinthians 15 (the 'new Adam') and Hebrews 5:8 (obedience through suffering)
24. ^ Dillistone (ibid). p. 201
25. ^ ibid. p. 214
26. ^ N. T. Wright, "The Cross and the Caricatures" Fulcrum (Eastertide 2007)
27. ^ An expression used by the Revd. Steve Chalke in his book The Lost Message of Jesus (Zondervaan 2003)
28. ^ see'Pierced for our Trangressions' Steve Jeffery, Mike Ovey, and Andrew Sach, Pierced for our Transgressions: Rediscovering the Glory of Penal Substitution (IVP, 2007) to which the N.T. Wright, bishop of Durahm has responded in 'The Cross of and the Caricatures'

References

  • Aulen, Gustaf, Christus Victor tr. A.G. Hebert (SPCK 1931)
  • Calvin, Jean, Institutes of the Christian Religion
  • Denney, James Atonement And The Modern Mind, (Hodder And Stoughton, 1903)
  • Dillistone, F.W. The Christian Understanding of the Atonement (Nisbet 1968)
  • Jeffery, Steve;, Ovey, Mike, and Sach, Andrew, Pierced for our Transgressions: Rediscovering the Glory of Penal Substitution (IVP, 2007).
  • Fiddes, Paul ''Past event and Present Salvation : the Story of the Atonement (1989)
  • Finlan,Stephen Problems With Atonement: The Origins Of, And Controversy About, The Atonement Doctrine, ISBN 0814652204
  • Kelly,J.N.D. Early Christian Doctrines (Adam & Charles Black 1968)
  • McIlwain,Norman 'The Biblical Revelation of the Cross', EAN 9780955102905
  • Morris,Leon. The Cross in the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1965) Chap. 8 The Cross in the Epistle to the Hebrews.
  • Leon Morris, The Apostolic Preaching of the Cross, 3rd ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1998).
  • Packer, J.I., Celebrating the Saving Work of God (Carlisle, UK: Paternoster, 1998) chap. 8 "What Did the Cross Achieve?" Chap. 9 Sacrifice and Satisfaction.
  • J. I. Packer, Knowing God (Downer’s Grove: Inter Varsity Press, 1973) chap.15 "The Wrath of God"; chap. 18 "The Heart of the Gospel".
  • Reymond, Robert, A New Systematic Theology of the Christian Faith (Nashville: Thomas Nelson, 1998) Chap. 17 The Character of the Cross Work of Christ.
  • Stott, John, The Cross of Christ (Downers Grove: IV Press, 1986).
  • Sykes, Stephen, The Story of the Atonement (DLT 1997)

See also

External links

Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
Jesus (8–2 BC/BCE to 29–36 AD/CE),[2] also known as Jesus of Nazareth, is the central figure of Christianity, and is also an important figure in several other religions.
..... Click the link for more information.
Christ is the English term for the Greek word Χριστός (Christós), which literally means "The Anointed One.
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
Part of a of articles on
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
Kingdom of God or Reign of God (Greek: Βασιλεία τοῦ Θεοῦ - Basileia tou Theou,[1]
..... Click the link for more information.
Gospel, from the Old English god-spell "good tidings" is a calque of Greek ευαγγέλιον (
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
The Bible is
  • Part of
(see The Hebrew Bible below)
  • Part of a series on Christianity
(see The New Testament below)


Bible
..... Click the link for more information.
Old Testament (sometimes abbreviated OT) is the first section of the two-part Christian Biblical canon, which includes the books of the Hebrew Bible as well as several Deuterocanonical books. Its exact contents differ in the various Christian denominations.
..... Click the link for more information.
New Testament (Greek: Καινή Διαθήκη, Kainē Diathēkē) is the name given to the final portion of the Christian Bible, written after the Old Testament.
..... Click the link for more information.
Books of the Bible are listed differently in the canons of Jews, and Catholic, Protestant, and Eastern Orthodox Christians, although there is overlap. A table comparing the canons of these denominations appears below, for both the Old Testament and the New Testament.
..... Click the link for more information.
A biblical canon is a list of Biblical books which establishes the set of books which are considered to be authoritative as scripture by a particular Jewish or Christian community.
..... Click the link for more information.
The biblical apocrypha includes texts written in the Jewish and Christian religious traditions that either:
  • were accepted into the biblical canon by some, but not all, Christian faiths, or
  • whose canonicity or lack thereof is not yet certain,[1] or

..... Click the link for more information.
Septuagint (IPA: /ˈsɛptuədʒɪnt/), or simply "LXX", is the name commonly given in the West to the Koine Greek version of the Old Testament, translated in stages between the 3rd and 1st centuries
..... Click the link for more information.
Editing of this page by unregistered or newly registered users is currently disabled due to vandalism.
If you are prevented from editing this page, and you wish to make a change, please discuss changes on the talk page, request unprotection, log in, or .
..... Click the link for more information.
This article or section may contain original research or unverified claims.
Please help Wikipedia by adding references. See the for details.
This article has been tagged since September 2007.

..... Click the link for more information.

..... Click the link for more information.
Sermon on the Mount was, according to the Gospel of Matthew 5-7 , a particular sermon given by Jesus of Nazareth (estimated around AD 30) on a mountainside to his disciples and a large crowd.
..... Click the link for more information.
Great Commission is the instruction of the resurrected Jesus Christ to his disciples, that they spread his teachings to all the nations of the world. It has become a tenet in Christian theology emphasizing mission work and evangelism.
..... Click the link for more information.
List of Bible translations. For the Bible in English and its history, see English Bible translations.

The Bible has been translated into many languages from the biblical languages of Hebrew and Greek.
..... Click the link for more information.
The Bible in English

Old English (pre-1066)
Middle English (1066-1500)
Early Modern English (1500-1800)
Modern Christian (1800-)
Modern Jewish (1853-)
Miscellaneous
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.
The neutrality and factual accuracy of this article are disputed.
Please see the relevant discussion on the .


Biblical Hermeneutics refers to methods of interpreting the Bible.
..... Click the link for more information.
Christianity

Foundations
Jesus Christ
Church Theology
New Covenant Supersessionism
Dispensationalism
Apostles Kingdom Gospel
History of Christianity Timeline
Bible
Old Testament New Testament
Books Canon Apocrypha
..... Click the link for more information.


This article is copied from an article on Wikipedia.org - the free encyclopedia created and edited by online user community. The text was not checked or edited by anyone on our staff. Although the vast majority of the wikipedia encyclopedia articles provide accurate and timely information please do not assume the accuracy of any particular article. This article is distributed under the terms of GNU Free Documentation License.