European Union
This article is part of the series: Politics and government of the European Union
Treaties
Rome Maastricht (Pillars) Amsterdam Nice Reform
Institutions
Commission President Jos Manuel Barroso Current College (2004-2009)
Parliament President Hans-Gert Pttering Members (2004-2009)
Council Presidency: Portugal (Lus Amado) European Council: Jos Scrates
Court of Justice President Members Auditors First Instance Civil Service
Elections
Last election (2004) 2007 by-election Next election (2009) Constituencies Parties Parliamentary groups
Related topics
States Enlargement Foreign relations Law EMU Other bodies Agencies
Other countries    •  • [ edit]

The Reform Treaty is a European Union treaty designed to reform the European Union following the failed European Constitution. The current draft is entitled the "Draft Treaty amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community". The agreement was reached on the treaty's final text at an informal summit in Lisbon on 19 October 2007. The treaty is set to be signed by European leaders on 13 December 2007, after which each member state of the Union will have to ratify it. It is generally expected that the treaty be signed in Lisbon, and therefore likely become known as the Treaty of Lisbon. A likely date for the treaty to come into force would then be 1 January 2009, in time before the 2009 European elections.^[1][2]

The proposed Constitution had failed ratification in referendums in France and the Netherlands in 2005. It had been ratified by 15 European Union member states but due to the requirement of unanimity in amending the EU's constitutional framework, the French and Dutch votes required EU leaders to amend the procedures and content of a new EU treaty. In June 2007, the European Council reached an agreement on the framework of a new treaty, which was finalised during an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) that started on 23 July of the same year and which lasted three months, culminating in a final treaty text agreed upon on 19 October.

Background

The Constitution

Further information: History of the European Constitution

The need to review the EU's constitutional framework, particularly in light of the impending accession of ten new member states in 2004, was highlighted in a declaration annexed to the Treaty of Nice in 2001. The agreements at Nice had paved the way for further enlargement of the Union by reforming voting procedures, but the treaty was widely regarded as not having gone far enough. The Laeken declaration of December 2001 committed the EU to improving democracy, transparency and efficiency, and set out the process by which a constitution could be arrived at. The European Convention was established, presided over by former French President Valéry Giscard d'Estaing, and was given the task of consulting as widely as possible across Europe with the aim of producing a first draft of the Constitution. The Convention consisted mainly of representatives of national parliaments, not only from existing member states but also from candidate countries, as well as representatives of heads of state and government. It published its final draft in July 2003. The final text of the proposed Constitution was agreed upon at the summit meeting on 18–19 June 2004 under the presidency of Ireland.

The Constitution, having been agreed by heads of government from the 25 member states, was signed at a ceremony in Rome on 29 October 2004. Before it could enter into force, however, it had to be unanimously ratified by each member state. Ratification took different forms in each country, depending on the traditions, constitutional arrangements, and political processes of each country. In 2005, Dutch and French voters rejected the European Constitution in national referendums. While the majority of the EU member states already had ratified the European Constitution, due to the requirement of unanimity to amend the constitutional treaties of the EU, this led to a "period of reflection" and the political end of the proposed European Constitution.

New impetus

In 2007, Germany took over the rotating EU Presidency and declared the period of reflection over. By March, the 50th anniversary of the Treaties of Rome, the Berlin Declaration was adopted by all member states. This declaration outlined the intention of all member states to agree on a new treaty in time for the 2009 Parliamentary elections, that is to have a ratified treaty before mid-2009.^[3]

Already before the Berlin Declaration, the Amato Group (officially the Action Committee for European Democracy, ACED) – a group of European politicians, backed by the Barroso Commission with two representatives in the group – worked unofficially on rewriting the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe (EU Constitution). On 4 June 2007 the group released their text in French – cut from 63,000 words in 448 articles in the Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe to 12,800 in 70 articles. In the Berlin Declaration, the EU leaders unofficially set a new timeline for the new treaty;

	21–23 June 2007		European Council meeting in Brussels, mandate for IGC
	23 July 2007		launch of Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) in Lisbon, text of Reform Treaty
	7–8 September 2007		Foreign Ministers’ meeting
	18–19 October 2007		European Council in Lisbon, final agreement on Reform Treaty
	13 December 2007		signing of the treaty in Lisbon
	by end of 2008		ratification by all member states
	1 January 2009		entry into force

June European Council

On 21 June 2007 the European Council met in Brussels to agree upon the foundation of a new treaty to replace the rejected Constitution. The meeting took place under the German Presidency of the Union, with Germany's Chancellor Angela Merkel leading the negotiations as President-in-Office of the European Council. After the Council quickly dealt with its other business, such as deciding on the accession of Cyprus and Malta to the Eurozone, negotiations on the Treaty took over and lasted till 5 a.m. on Saturday morning, 23 June 2007.

Agreement was reached on a 16-page mandate for an Intergovernmental Conference, that proposed removing much of the constitutional terminology and many of the symbols from the old European Constitution text. In addition it was agreed to recommend to the IGC that the provisions of the old European Constitution should be amended in certain key aspects (such as voting or foreign policy). Due to pressure from the United Kingdom and Poland, it was also decided to recommend limiting the application of Charter of fundamental human rights within the EU (a potential opting-out provision for the UK). Among the specific changes were greater ability to opt-out in certain areas of legislation and that the proposed new voting system that was part of the European Constitution would not be used before 2014 (see Provisions below).^[4][5]

In the June meeting, the name "Reform Treaty" also emerged, finally eliminating the name "Constitution for Europe" for the new EU treaty. Technically it was agreed that the Reform Treaty would amend both the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community to include most provisions of the European Constitution, however not to combine them into one document. It was also agreed to rename the Treaty establishing the European Community (EC-Treaty), which is the main functional agreement including most of the substantive provisions of European primary law, to "Treaty on the Functioning of the Union". In addition it was agreed, that unlike in the European Constitution where a Charter was included in the text, there would only be a reference to the existing Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union to make that document legally binding.^[4] Many of the amendments followed the procedures as suggested by the Amato Group.

October European Council

At the European Council meeting on 18 October and 19 October 2007 in Lisbon, a few last-minute concessions were made to ensure the signing of the treaty:^[6]

• Italy gained an additional MEP, while the President of the EP will no longer be counted as an MEP (thus keeping the 750 MEP ceiling);
• Poland got a slightly stronger wording for the revived Ioannina Compromise, plus a nomination for an additional Advocate General at the European Court of Justice. The creation of the permanent "Polish" Advocate General is formally conditioned by an increase of the number of Advocates General from 8 to 11.^[7]
• Austria got a suspension of the court case over its student quotas;
• Bulgaria succeeded in having the Cyrillic transcription of "euro" be spelt "евро" to sound "evro" (instead of "еуро" as requested by the European Central Bank).

Intergovernmental Conference

Portugal had pressed and supported Germany to reach an agreement on a mandate for an Intergovernmental Conference (IGC) under their presidency. After the June negotiations and final settlement on a 16-page framework for the new Reform Treaty, the Intergovernmental conference on actually drafting the new treaty commenced on 23 July 2007. The IGC opened following a short ceremony. The Portuguese presidency presented a 145 page document (with an extra 132 pages of 12 protocols and 51 declarations) entitled the "Draft Treaty amending the Treaty on European Union and the Treaty establishing the European Community" and made it available on the Council of the European Union website as a starting point for the drafting process.^[8]

In addition to government representatives and legal scholars from each member state, the European Parliament sent three representatives. These were conservative Elmar Brok, social democratic Enrique Baron Crespo and liberal Andrew Duff.^[9]

Before the opening of the IGC, the Polish government expressed a desire to go back on the June agreement, notably over the voting system, but relented due to a desire not to be seen as the sole trouble maker over the negotiations and due to political pressure by most other European member states.^[10] However, according to some media reports, during the drafting process, Poland and Ireland may join the UK in its opt-out of the Charter on human rights, and Poland may call for further codification of rules regarding the ability of countries to delay legislation.^[11][12] Despite an opt-out for Ireland having been negotiated, the ICTU has stated it will push for a no vote, if the opt-out is exercised.^[13]

It is currently planned to close this conference, mainly consisting of legal experts of all member states, at Council meetings on 18 and 19 October 2007. As the IGC is held in Lisbon and the European Council meeting in October will take place in Lisbon as well, it is likely the treaty will be called the "Lisbon Treaty" in the style of past treaties (excluding the Constitution's IGC in Rome); the Maastricht Treaty in Maastricht (1992), the Amsterdam Treaty in Amsterdam (1997), and the Nice Treaty in Nice (2001). It would be signed either at the conclusion of the IGC or if an agreement is not reached by then, probably in December.

Content

The Reform Treaty is intended to keep most of the institutional innovations that were agreed upon in the European Constitution, such as a permanent EU president, a foreign minister (renamed "High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy"), the same distribution of parliamentary seats, a reduced number of commissioners, a clause on withdrawal from the EU and a full legal personality (currently held only by the European Community) allowing it to sign international agreements. In addition many of the political changes and substantial amendments to the old treaties in the European Constitution have also been kept. The following points are the major changes with regard to the European Constitution and the old treaties:

Names and constitutional elements

The "Treaty Establishing the European Community" (Treaty of Rome) will be renamed the “Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union”. However, in contrast to the European Constitution, the two main treaties of the European Union will not be combined to one single constitutional treaty.

In addition there will be some changes to the institutions of the Union: the European Council and European Central Bank will both become official institutions; the Council of the European Union will be known in the treaty as 'the Council' or the 'Council of Ministers'; the Court of Justice of the European Communities shall be known as the 'Court of Justice of the European Union', and the term 'European Commission' will also be used in the treaties instead of the Commission of the European Communities.<ref name="draft" />

It was agreed to drop most of the state-like features such as the name "constitution", as well as reference to EU symbols (flag, anthem, motto). However all the symbols are already in use, the flag having been adopted in the 1980s, and the Constitution would have just given them a more formal status. So despite being dropped from the text, use will continue: indeed the Parliament, in response to the dropping of the symbols, announced it would make greater use of them. In line with eliminating all "state-like" terminology and symbols, new names for various types of EU legislation have been dropped, in particular the proposal to rename EU regulations and directives to be EU "laws".^{[13][13][4][14]}

Charter of Fundamental Rights

Main article: Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union

The 54-article Charter of Fundamental Rights lists citizens' political, social and economic rights. It is supposed to make sure that EU regulations and directives do not contradict the European Convention on Human Rights which is ratified by all EU member states (and to which the EU as a whole would accede to under the treaty<ref name="draft" />). In the rejected EU Constitution it was integrated into the text of the treaty and was legally binding. The UK, as one of the two countries with a common law legal system in the EU^[15] and a largely uncodified Constitution, was strongly against making it legally binding.^[13] The German presidency suggested a reference to it with a single article in the "Reform Treaty" but maintained that it should be legally binding, with possibly some extra safeguards to prevent the EU court's interpretation of the charter forcing a change of national laws.^[13] The United Kingdom and Poland have both fought for the inclusion of a protocol which it is intended should prevent new rights being given to the citizens of both nations:

Article 1 1. The Charter does not extend the ability of the Court of Justice of the European Union, or any court or tribunal of Poland or of the United Kingdom, to find that the laws, regulations or administrative provisions, practices or action of Poland or of the United Kingdom are inconsistent with the fundamental rights, freedoms and principles that it reaffirms. 2. In particular, and for the avoidance of doubt, nothing in Title IV of the Charter creates justiciable rights applicable to Poland or the United Kingdom except in so far as Poland or the United Kingdom has provided for such rights in its national law. Article 2 To the extent that a provision of the Charter refers to national laws and practices, it shall only apply to Poland or the United Kingdom to the extent that the rights or principles that it contains are recognised in the law or practices of Poland or of the United Kingdom.

Foreign relations

Main article: High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy

Foreign Relations is a policy area which requires unanimity among the members of the EU according to the reform treaty. It will merge the post of High Representative for the Common Foreign and Security Policy with the European Commissioner for External Relations and European Neighbourhood Policy in an effort to reduce the number of Commissioners in the European Commission. The High Representative will also become a Commission vice-president and get a diplomatic corps. The Constitution called this post the Union Foreign Minister. In the Reform Treaty this post will be called High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.^[4][4]

Several member states feared that this post will undermine their national foreign policy, so the EU summit mandated that the IGC will agree to the following Declaration:

In addition to the specific procedures referred to in [paragraph 1 of Article 11], the Conference underlines that the provisions covering Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) including in relation to the High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and External Action Service will not affect the existing legal basis, responsibilities, and powers of each Member State in relation to the formulation and conduct of its foreign policy, its national diplomatic service, relations with third countries and participation in international organisations, including a Member State's membership of the Security Council of the UN. The Conference also notes that the provisions covering CFSP do not give new powers to the Commission to initiate decisions or increase the role of the European Parliament. The Conference also recalls that the provisions governing the CFSP do not prejudice the specific character of the security and defence policy of the Member States.

The changes in foreign relations have been seen by some as the core changes in the treaty, in the same way the Single European Act had created a single market, the Maastricht Treaty had created the euro or the Treaty of Amsterdam created greater cooperation in justice and home affairs.^[18]

The European Parliament and National Parliaments

See also:

The power of the directly elected European Parliament would be increased under the Reform Treaty. Currently most policy areas fall under co-decision procedure. After ratification of the Reform Treaty this procedure (now called the "ordinary legislative procedure") would apply to virtually all areas of EU policy meaning that the Parliament would have comparable powers to those of the Council. In the few remaining areas the Consultation procedure (now called "special legislative procedures") applies. The Parliament also gains greater powers over the entirety of the EU budget, not just non-compulsory expenditure, through the ordinary legislative procedure.

National parliaments will be given a greater role in any reform of the EU Treaty (new Article 33 replacing Article 48) and in responding to new applications for membership (new Article 34 replacing Article 49). National parliaments will be able to veto measures furthering judicial cooperation in civil matters (new Article 69d).

Article 8c: National Parliaments shall contribute actively to the good functioning of the Union: (a) through being informed by the institutions of the Union and having draft European legislative acts forwarded to them in accordance with the Protocol on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union; (b) by seeing to it that the principle of subsidiarity is respected in accordance with the procedures provided for in the Protocol on the application of the principles of subsidiarity and proportionality; (c) by taking part, within the framework of the area of freedom, security and justice, in the evaluation mechanisms for the implementation of the Union policies in that area, in accordance with Article 64 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, and through being involved in the political monitoring of Europol and the evaluation of Eurojust's activities in accordance with Articles 69k and 69h of that Treaty; (d) by taking part in the revision procedures of the Treaties, in accordance with Article 33 of this Treaty; (e) by being notified of applications for accession to the Union, in accordance with Article 34 of this Treaty; (f) by taking part in the inter-parliamentary cooperation between national Parliaments and with the European Parliament, in accordance with the Protocol on the role of national Parliaments in the European Union.

These points were "red line" issues for Dutch prime minister Jan-Peter Balkenende who wanted a greater role for national parliaments in the EU decision making process.^[19]

Protocol 2 provides for a greater role of national parliaments in ensuring that EU measures comply with the principle of subsidiarity. In comparison with the proposed Constitution, the Reform Treaty allows national parliaments eight rather than six weeks to study European Commission legislative proposals and decide whether to send a reasoned opinion stating why the national parliament considers it to be incompatible with subsidiarity. National parliaments may vote to have the measure reviewed. If one third (or one quarter, where the proposed EU measure concerns freedom, justice and security) of votes are in favour of a review, the Commission will have to review the measure and if it decides to maintain it, must give a reasoned opinion to the Union legislator as to why it considers the measure to be compatible with subsidiarity.

Voting in the Council

Main article: Voting in the Council of the European Union

The Reform Treaty will introduce a new voting procedure in the Council of the European Union for legislation which do not require unanimous decisions. This so called qualified majority is reached when a majority of all member countries (55%) who represent a majority of all citizens (65%) vote in favour of the proposal. When the Council is not acting on a proposal of the Commission, the necessary majority of all member countries is increased to 72% while the population requirement stays the same. To block legislation at least 4 countries have to be against the proposal.

The current Nice treaty voting rules (that include a majority of countries (50% / 67%), voting weights (74%) and population (62%)) will remain in place until 2014. Between 2014 and 2017 a transitional phase will take place where the new qualified majority voting rules apply, but where the old Nice treaty voting weights can be applied when a member state wishes so. Also from 2014 a new version of the 1994 "Ioannina Compromise" will take effect, which allows small minorities of EU states to call for re-examination of EU decisions they do not like.^[20]

Policy areas

See also:

According to the Reform Treaty, the EU's three "pillar" structure would be replaced. The union's competencies in two major legislative areas or "pillars" – foreign and security policy (second pillar) and justice and home affairs (third pillar) – would be increased at the same time. However the UK was opposed to extension of supranational powers in these areas in order to avoid a national referendum. Under the June agreement, the UK will also not be obliged to take part in EU cooperation in judicial and police affairs. On foreign policy and defence, the national veto will be retained but other innovations from the constitution are retained.

In the Reform Treaty the policy areas of the EU are classified into one of the following three areas:

* Exclusive competence: In this area the EU has exclusive competence to make directives. It also has exclusive competence for the conclusion of an international agreement when its conclusion is provided for in a legislative act of the Union.

* Shared competence: The competence to legislate in this area is shared between the member states and the EU.

* Supporting competence: Here the EU is allowed to carry out actions to support, coordinate or supplement the actions of the Member States.

Exclusive competence	Shared competence	Supporting competence
customs union the establishing of the competition rules necessary for the functioning of the internal market monetary policy for the Member States whose currency is the euro the conservation of marine biological resources under the common fisheries policy common commercial policy	internal market social policy, for the aspects defined in this Treaty economic, social and territorial cohesion agriculture and fisheries, excluding the conservation of marine biological resources environment consumer protection transport trans-European networks energy area of freedom, security and justice common safety concerns in public health matters, for the aspects defined in this Treaty	protection and improvement of human health industry culture tourism education, youth, sport and vocational training civil protection administrative cooperation

Member states can have opt-outs from some of these policy areas (e.g. UK opt-out from legislation in the area of freedom, security and justice).

The Treaty will provide countries with a chance to opt out of EU policies in the area of police and criminal law – as pushed for by the UK, supported by the Czech Republic.^[17] Provisions in the Treaty framework draft from the June 2007 summit stated that the division of power between member states and the Union is a two-way process, implying that powers can be taken back from the union.

President of the European Council

The current post of President-in-Office of the European Council is loosely defined, with the Union's treaties stating only that the European Council shall be chaired by the head of government (or state) of the country holding the presidency of the European Union which rotates every six months.^[22]. If ratified the new President of the European Council would be elected for a two and a half year term. The election would take place by a qualified majority among the members of the body, and the President can be removed by the same procedure. Unlike the President of the European Commission, there is no approval from the European Parliament.^[23]

The President's work would be largely administrative in coordinating the work of the Council and organising the meeting. It does however offer external representation of the council and the Union and reports to the European Parliament after Council meetings and at the beginning and end of his term.

In many newspapers this post is being called "President of Europe". This is very misleading since the post of President of the European Commission has legislative and executive powers which the President of the European Council lacks.

Enlargement and secession

Main article: Enlargement of the European Union

The Reform Treaty, just like the European Constitution, will include language on potential member states having to adhere to the bloc's values if they want to become members of the union. A Dutch suggestion to enshrine the Copenhagen Criteria for further enlargement in the new treaty has not been fully taken on board as there are fears it would lead to ECJ judges having the last word on who could join the EU, rather than its political leaders.^[17] During the June 2007 summit Dutch prime minister Jan Peter Balkenende, secured stronger enlargement criteria in the treaty. They make it more difficult for would-be member states to get their applications approved, give slightly more power to national parliaments over proposed EU legislation and add a protocol stating that the new treaty does not affect the right of member states to provide services of general interest.

Just like the European Constitution the Reform Treaty will include a provision that makes it possible for EU member states for the first time to legally and officially terminate their membership. While there has been an instance where a territory has ceased to be part of the EC (Greenland in 1985), there is currently no regulated opportunity to exit the European Union.

Climate change and energy solidarity

The Reform Treaty has additional agreements regarding climate change and the fight against global warming, which have been added as targets for the European Union. In addition, several provisions of the treaties have been amended to include solidarity in matters of energy supply and changes to the energy policy within the European Union.

Ratification and referenda

Under a timetable envisioned by Germany and agreed by the June 2007 summit, all member states will use the mandate agreed at the June 2007 summit as the basis for negotiations on a new Treaty, which should be finished by the end of the year and ratified in all member states the end of 2008, entering into force on 1 January 2009 ahead of the next European elections. Most states are likely to try to avoid having a referendum on the treaty – with only Ireland obliged to (due to its constitution) – and will aim to ratify it by their national parliaments. In Denmark, calls for a referendum are ongoing^[24][25] to hold a referendum on the treaty. In Scotland the Scottish National Party wants to hold a consultative referendum on the treaty.

In the Czech Republic, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom considerations over whether to hold referendums were made. In all cases, the governments decided to ratify the treaty through parliament. In the Netherlands and the United Kingdom, the parliament could force a referendum against the government's decision; however, this is considered unlikely, as anti-referendum parties hold a majority.^[26][27]

Reactions

Following the June agreement German foreign minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier declared that in his view the only thing left to do is to draft the legal compromise reached in June into "legal provisions". Austrian foreign minister Ursula Plassnik concurred and added "the only thing left to do is get the language right and work on the legal details, and announced her confidence that within 12 weeks a treaty ready to sign could be prepared.<ref name="dne2007-07-23" /> This was echoed by José Manuel Barroso, the president of the European Commission, who stated that he is 'confident' that the 27 EU member states will reach a political agreement on a new reform treaty for the bloc by October. He added that "We now have the draft treaty text. The political consensus that was reached at the last European council is now translated into legal language."^[28]

However, others such as Poland have indicated they wish to re-open some areas. During June, Poland's Prime Minister had controversially stated that Poland would have a substantially larger population were it not for World War II.^[29] The president of the European Parliament Hans-Gert Pöttering declared that there should not be new negotiations on substance and that no agreement on a re-opening, as suggested for instance by Poland, should occur. Elmar Brok, who is part of the Delegation of the European Parliament added "This mandate now needs to be implemented into a draft" right now.^[30]

United Kingdom

The Reform Treaty has been greeted with controversy in the United Kingdom.^[31] The ruling Labour Party had promised a referendum over the UK's ratification of the constitution; however, Tony Blair announced that the new Reform Treaty would not be subject to a referendum. Due to the Reform Treaty including many changes to the old European constitutional framework that the European Constitution proposed, media reported that the British public felt a referendum should still be held over the new Reform Treaty.^[32] In response, Blair, and his successor Gordon Brown, claimed that the treaty would not require a referendum so long as certain 'red lines' were not crossed; i.e., that the UK continued to retain vetoes over collective foreign policy, common law (so the Charter of Fundamental Rights would be without legal effect) and social security and tax laws.^[33] While Blair claimed to have reached this compromise, doubt was cast over the legal efficacy of his foreign policy opt-out, especially since the EU retained an extensive array of diplomatic machinery – implying that the EU would indeed be conducting collective diplomatic policies, regardless of Britain's feelings in the matter.^[34] Also of concern was the removal of the term "free and undistorted" from the objectives of the EU. This was made by the request of French president Sarkozy who felt that this is not a philosophical objective but rather a tool to reach the objective.

3. The Union shall establish an internal market (where competition is free and undistorted). It shall work for the sustainable development of Europe based on balanced economic growth and price stability, a highly competitive social market economy, aiming at full employment and social progress, and a high level of protection and improvement of the quality of the environment. It shall promote scientific and technological advance.

Members of Parliament in the UK have also criticised that during the first few days of drafting the Reform Treaty only a French version was available, which they claim prevented proper scrutiny of the new European Union treaty by failing to provide the House of Commons with an English version.^[35] The European Scrutiny Committee of the House of Commons asserted in October 2007 that the Reform Treaty is "substantially equivalent" to the old European Constitution treaty, and that the special exceptions made in the new treaty for the United Kingdom might not prove to be effective in practice.^[36][37] This view has been challenged by British foreign affairs minister David Miliband.^[38]

Quotations

• "The one who wins in these kinds of situations is the one with the strongest nerves."

: —Lech Kaczyński, President of Poland, 22 June 2007^[20]

• "The constitutional treaty was an easily understandable treaty. This is a simplified treaty which is very complicated."

: —Jean-Claude Juncker, Prime Minister of Luxembourg, 23 June 2007^[39]

• "Nobody really wants to postpone the decision or create another crisis."

: —Margot Wallström, Commission Vice-President and Institutional Relations and Communication Strategy Commissioner, 12 October 2007^[40]

References

External links

Official documents

• Draft Reform Treaty
• Intergovernmental Conference 2007
• Brussels European Council 21/22 June 2007 – Presidency Conclusions with Annex I – Draft IGC Mandate, 23 June 2007
• Brussels European Council 21/22 June 2007 – Presidency Conclusions, Corrigendum(?), 20 July 2007

Other

• 10 Myths about the Reform Treaty, UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office
• LinksDossier: EU in search of a new Treaty, EurActiv.com, updated (26 April 2007)
• David Charter: Q&A: the EU reform treaty, Times, 2007-06-21
• Key points of EU reform treaty draft, AFP / EUbusiness, 2007-06-21
• EU leaders to discuss new treaty, BBC News, 2007-06-21
• A close look at the Reform Treaty, Stephen Mulvey, BBC News website, 3 August 2007
• The new treaty: what will it mean, and do we need a referendum? (PDF), Open Europe, 7 May 2007
• Treaty on European Union – How does it compare to the Constitution? (PDF), Open Europe, July 2007
• The new EU reform treaty (PDF) Federal Union, 23 June 2007

•  • [ e] Topics on the European Union
History	History of Europe Timeline (Pre-1945 1945–1957 1958–1972 1973–1993 1999–2004 2004–Present) ECSC EEC Euratom
Politics	Enlargement Eurojust Europol Three pillars (Community Common Foreign and Security Policy Police and Judicial Cooperation) Integration Military
Government	Agencies Commission Council Courts Elections Enlargement European Council Foreign relations Parliament Political parties
Law	Acquis Competition law Copyright law Journal Procedure Regulation Treaties (Rome • Maastricht • Amsterdam • Nice • Reform)
Geography	Borders Extreme points Largest cities Largest urban areas Member states Special member-state territories Regions
Economy	Agriculture Euro (€) Central Bank Investment Bank Investment Fund Eurozone Energy Regional development Transport (Galileo)
Society	Citizenship Demographics Education EIIT Languages News media Religion Sport Symbols (Flag Anthem) Statistics
	Agencies Directives Largest cities Member states Political parties Presidency Tallest buildings
WikiProject